00

Teneo.ai

Persona Briefing

For the COO / VP Operations

You are about to be asked to deliver an operating model change that has no historical precedent. Here is what to plan for.

Book a 15-minute ops briefing

How peer operations leaders are sequencing the FCC onshoring response.
01

THE STAKES

Why this lands on your desk

The FCC NPRM is being framed in the press as a customer experience issue. From the operations side, it is an industrial-scale workforce, real estate and process redesign problem — and you are the one who will be asked to deliver it.
The fundamental tension: under any realistic implementation of the proposed rules, US telecom contact center operating models will have to change. The question is not whether you change them — it is whether you change them on a 12-month schedule of your choosing, or on a regulator-imposed schedule of someone else's.

The Operations Reality

Charter committed to onshore Cox call centers within 18 months. Industry analysts and the labor union both agree publicly: full US relocation at scale is impossible in that timeframe. The path forward is hybrid — and the hybrid path is an operations problem, not a CX problem.

02

DECISIONS

The five operational decisionsyou have to make

01
Certification

Site strategy.

What it means in an airline context

Where does new US capacity go? Greenfield, existing facilities, or third-party BPO partners onshore? Each has different lead times, real estate exposure and labor pool dynamics.

02
Certification

Workforce planning.

What it means in an airline context

US contact center labor pools are tight in tier-1 metros and have specific wage floors. Tier-2/3 cities offer cost relief but have shallower talent pools. What is your geographic distribution plan?

03
Certification

Technology stack.

What it means in an airline context

Your existing offshore CCaaS configuration was built for a different operating model. Hybrid means routing decisions made in real-time at the IVR layer (this call resolves in AI; that call goes to a US human; that one is sensitive and must go to a US human). That is an architecture problem.

04
Certification

Vendor governance.

What it means in an airline context

Your offshore BPO contracts were structured around volume. Reduced volume on the offshore side without reducing your contractual commitments leaves you paying for capacity you cannot use.

05
Certification

Reporting and audit.

What it means in an airline context

The proposed rules require ongoing reporting to the FCC: percentage offshore, transfer requests, transfer wait times, English proficiency testing results. Your operations data infrastructure has to support this.

03

FRAMEWORK

How peer operations leadersare routing the calls

The recurring framework looks like this:

Call category

Sensitive transactions (passwords, MFA, payments, SSN)

Where it goes

Mandatory US human

Operations impact

Onshore staffing requirement, no flexibility

Call category

Routine inquiries (billing, plan changes, basic troubleshooting)

Where it goes

AI-led resolution

Operations impact

Volume reduction = headcount reduction across geographies

Call category

Complex / multi-issue / escalations

Where it goes

US human OR offshore human (within cap)

Operations impact

Tier 2 staffing — onshore preferred for the disclosure label

Call category

Spanish / non-English language calls

Where it goes

Specialized routing

Operations impact

Open question — FCC has not addressed this clearly yet

Want this walked through with one of our solution architects?

How peer operations leaders are sequencing the response.

BOOK A 15-MINUTE BRIEFING

04

PLANNING

What to be planningright now

01

A baseline of your current call mix by category — sensitive vs routine vs complex vs language-other-than-English

02

A workforce plan that reduces offshore demand by automating the routine and complex-but-resolvable categories — not just cutting headcount

03

A real estate and BPO partner conversation: how do you scale US capacity for the calls that genuinely need a human?

04

A vendor contract review: which offshore commitments are flexible enough to reduce volume on, and which lock you in?

00

A data and reporting layer that can produce the FCC-mandated metrics on demand

05

PRECEDENT

The Charter precedent — andwhy it matters for you

Charter's public commitment to onshore Cox within 18 months sets a benchmark for the entire industry. Two operational implications:

01

Talent pool competition.

If multiple carriers move toward US capacity at the same time, contact center wages and lease rates in target markets go up. First movers get better economics.
02

BPO partner pressure.

US-based BPO partners (Concentrix, Foundever, TaskUs domestic operations, regional players) are about to be in a sellers' market. Lock relationships now or pay later.
06

TENEO

Where Teneo fitsin the operations conversation

Teneo handles the volume-reduction half of the equation.

We resolve customer interactions in AI — accurately, in the customer's language, integrated with your existing CCaaS — so onshore staffing can stay focused on the calls that genuinely need a human and the sensitive transactions you have no choice on.

01

Teneo handles the volume-reduction half of the equation.

We resolve customer interactions in AI — accurately, in the customer's language, integrated with your existing CCaaS.
02

Onshore staffing can stay focused.

Onshore staffing can stay focused on the calls that genuinely need a human and the sensitive transactions you have no choice on.
03

Published outcomes from our deployments include automation.

Published outcomes from our deployments include automation of up to 100% of Level 1 support and over 50% of Level 2.
04

That is not a deflection story. It is a resolution story.

The customer's issue gets solved on the first contact.
Your offshore volume reduces.
Your US capacity covers what is left. The disclosure label tells a clean narrative.

Deployment timeline is typically 60 days, which matters when you are working against an 18-month operating model change.

100%

Level 1 support automated

50%+

Level 2 support automated

99%

First contact resolution

30%

Operational cost reduction

60days

Typical deployment timeline

Book a 15-Minute Ops Briefing

How peer operations leaders are sequencing the FCC response. No pitch.

FCC NPRM 26-16 was adopted on March 26, 2026. Public comments are due May 26, 2026; reply comments are due June 22, 2026. Final rules are expected 12-18 months out and may differ materially from the proposal. This page reflects our reading of the rule as of publication.